Showing posts with label Cars. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cars. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 17, 2014

Fast Car With Weird Name Built in West Richland, WA

This one is for my friends and family back in Washington State, particularly the Tri-Cities.


It looks like American supercar builder SSC is finally getting ready to start construction of its new factory in West Richland, WA. Planning for the facility to build the Tuatara (pictured above) goes back to at least 2011, but, according to the local Tri-City Herald, a delay in funding is the cause for the setback
Now, things finally appear to be back on track. Construction is scheduled for August with completion in early 2015, according to the report. However, it will be several months after that before deliveries will begin. With approximately 40,000 square feet of floor space, SSC will be able to finish one car a month at first with production ramping up later. 
The planned Tuatara supercar packs a claimed 1,350 horsepower and 1,280 pound-feet of torque, allowing a prototype model reached 200 miles per hour in an impressive 16 seconds. Deliveries were slated to begin by January 2014. 
I think my Sprinter van reaches 60 mph in 16 seconds.  Maybe.  Plus, the Tuatara is supposedly designed for a 275 mph top speed.  You can read a lot more information on SSC and their Tuatara by following this link to Autoblog.com.  This is the link to the article from the Tri-City Hearald.


In case you're not from the Pacific Northwest, the Tri-City area (Richland, Kennewick and Pasco) is best known for the Hanford nuclear site and the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.  It's not exactly a hotbed of manufacturing, so SSC's choice is definitely unconventional.  Whatever their reasons for choosing West Richland, I wish them great success, and I hope to visit the factory some day.


Thursday, February 27, 2014

Jeff Gordon Pranks Journalist Who Called His Last Prank Fake

Remember that Pepsi commercial with NASCAR driver Jeff Gordon in which he took an unsuspecting car salesman for the test drive of his life?



Many, including me, thought it was staged.  Travis Okulski, writer for online car magazine Jalopnik, was one of those people.  So, Jeff Gordon played a similar prank on him, and the result is hilarious!


You can read Mr Okulski's account at Jalopnik.




Thursday, February 20, 2014

German Union Boss Threatens VW's Chattanoooga Workers

Aren't unions supposed to represent the will of the ordinary worker?  If so, what to do when ordinary workers - of their own free will - vote against the UAW?  Apparently, they make threats.
this latest tidbit is sure to raise more than a few eyebrows, as it came straight from Bernd Osterloh, head of VW's works council in Germany.
I can imagine fairly well that another VW factory in the United States, provided that one more should still be set up there, does not necessarily have to be assigned to the south again. ... If co-determination isn't guaranteed in the first place, we as workers will hardly be able to vote in favor [of another VW plant in the southern US].
In other words, VW's works council, which has to approve any new plants before they can be built, may block further expansion in southern US states due to the area's apparent anti-union stance.
Source: NYT
Or, to put it another way, "unionize or we'll refuse to create any more jobs in your area."  Or, still another way, "VW's American employees are too stupid to know what's good for them, so from now on we'll decide for them if they'll join a union."

The anti-liberty sentiment among the UAW supporters is striking.  Look through the comments to the Autoblog article, and you'll see response after response stating that Southerners are too stupid and/or uneducated to know what's good for them.

I asked the following question in the comments:
Who is best qualified to decide what is in the Chattanooga plant workers' best interest?
1. The Chattanooga plant workers?
2. The UAW?
3. VW's works council in Germany?
4. Autoblog readers?
5. Someone else?
Here's one response from a UAW supporter.
VW Works Council...they have the decision-making power as to which of their plants get new products (work)...since the Works Council make up 50% of VW's board, they are the ones who call the shots...European/German labor unions are very different from American labor unions, they encourage a collaborative nature between management and workers...voting for the union at Tennessee would have brought that sort of enlightenment to the American shores...there is a reason why Mercedes-Benz, BMW and VW/Audi/Porsche/Bugatti/Lamborghini, etc. are some of the most respected brands on the globe...they treat and pay their workers well, management is held accountable and that results in superior products...it would be great for some of that to rub off on the American psyche...god knows we need it...
See?  VW's Works Council knows the Chattanooga workers' needs better than the Chattanooga workers do.

I also quoted a New York Times article on the vote and added some commentary.
"Mike Burton, a VW worker who led the anti-union drive, said many workers felt that they were paid well and treated well without having a union and thus saw no need to have one. He said many workers objected to the U.A.W. having initially sought unionization based on what it said was having a majority of cards signed favoring a union. 
'We don’t need the U.A.W. to give us rights we already have,' he said. 'We can already talk to the company if we have any problems'.” ~ NYT 
The workers voted and the UAW lost. The workers are best qualified to decide what is in their own best interest. They decided. Leave them alone. 
Here's a response to that comment.
The workers were indoctrinated with bullshit from the right they don't know whats best for them. Maybe the UAW isn't the best for them but they deserve some form of workers council.
Ah, yes.  The old "false consciousness" argument.  How Marxist.

Most Leftists on the national stage are smart enough to realize that telling the people you're trying to convince that they're too stupid to make their own decisions, so instead they're blaming Republicans, the eeeeeevil Right and even (gasp!) the Koch Brothers for the UAW's defeat.
I have one word for you.  Koch!
“I think it was unprecedented that outside forces, whether it was the Koch brothers and the money they spent here, whether it was [Republican Sen. Bob] Corker, whether it was Grover Norquist, all these people who were going to come in and threaten the company and threaten workers, to me was outrageous,” said UAW President Bob King, at a news conference after the tally was announced.
Seriously, if the Koch brothers were as powerful in real life as they are in Lefties' fever dreams of them, they'd be masters of the universe by now.

As the NYT article demonstrates, neither Republican politicians nor libertarian activists defeated the UAW.  The workers themselves did, with a lot of help from the UAW's reputation.
Standing outside the Volkswagen plant, Mike Jarvis, a three-year employee who works on the finishing line, said the majority had voted against U.A.W. because they were persuaded the union had hurt Detroit’s automakers. 
“Look at what happened to the auto manufacturers in Detroit and how they struggled. They all shared one huge factor: the U.A.W.,” said Mr. Jarvis, who added that he had had bad experiences with other labor unions. “If you look at how the U.A.W’s membership has plunged, that shows they’re doing a lot wrong.”
Mike Jarvis, by the way, wrote an opinion piece for the NYT explaining why he helped organize opposition to the UAW.

As George Will wrote in the Washington Post:
UAW officials blamed last week’s failure on “outside special-interest groups,” which describes the UAW in Chattanooga. In a characteristically shrill and clumsy intervention before the voting ended, Barack Obama accused Tennessee Republicans of being “more concerned about German shareholders than American workers.” He missed the detail that the shareholders’ company favored the UAW. The UAW, too, blamed Tennessee’s Republican politicians. 
Funny how everyone opposing the UAW is caricatured as an "outside special-interest group" exerting undue influence, but everyone supporting the UAW - including the president of the United States, with the biggest bully pulpit on Earth - is not.

None of that matters.  What matters is that the workers have the right to choose for themselves whether or not they want the UAW to represent them.  The workers declined UAW representation.  That's it.  Period.  End of discussion.

Unless, of course, you believe VW's Chattanooga workers are incapable of making their own decisions and should therefore have their right to choose for themselves violated.  If so, I wonder what other rights the UAW's supporters would like to steal from VW's Chattanooga workers.

It's for their own good, of course.  The UAW and their Democrat allies simply want to do for Chattanooga what they did for Detroit.




Sunday, November 4, 2012

Jeep Campers!

To add a little levity (which has been sorely lacking lately), I present to you the following totally awesome camper conversions of Jeep Wranglers, courtesy of Autoblog.com.

The Thaler Design Action Camper...


And the Earth Roamer XV-JP.


Unfortunately, Earth Roamer discontinued production of the XV-JP because Chrysler never offered a Diesel option, as they'd promised they would back in 2006.  I wouldn't consider such a vehicle without Diesel, but for those who prefer gasoline, these look like outstanding rigs for all kinds of outdoor adventure and fun.

UPDATE: I just looked at the rest of the Earth Roamer website and these look awesome!




This beast is my favorite.

Come on; you have to admit that's cool! 

Sunday, April 8, 2012

Flying Cars Finally Arrive

After decades of promises and false starts, two companies - one American and one Dutch - finally produce flying cars.

The Dutch PAL-V One looks more practical, if such a thing can be said of a flying, road going vehicle.


Monday, March 5, 2012

Audi R18 TDI Hybrid (Continued)

As I mentioned before, Audi designed and built two examples of their R18 Diesel-powered endurance race car with a hybrid drive train.  Now we find out that the hybrid system used in the R18 is very similar to the one used in the Porsche GT3 R Hybrid, which is not surprising, since both companies are part of the Volkwagen Group.  Autoblog tells us:
Unveiled yesterday, the R18 e-tron Quattro takes the same form as the conventionally powered R18 Ultra, but with one important difference: its TDI diesel engine is assisted by a regenerative braking system that gives it not only hybrid power but (through-the-road) all-wheel drive.
Schematic of Audi's Diesel-Hybrid racing power train.
In case you haven't noticed, I'm very excited about these new racers and the technological advancements they represent.  Unfortunately, I'll be "off the net" when the 24 Hours of Le Mans runs this June.

Oh, well.  I guess Aimee will just have to get me the highlights DVD as a present.  Hint, hint.

The Audi R18 TDI Ultra (left) and R18 e-tron Quattro endurance race cars.
The best thing about these cars is that the technology Audi developed for them will likely end up in street legal cars ordinary people can buy (okay, ordinary people with lots of money).  After all, Audi first developed "Quattro" (I have no idea why they insist on misspelling it) all-wheel-drive for rally racing, and their Diesel technology is slowly trickling back down to their street legal cars.

Man, I love racing!  Okay, not NASCAR.  NASCAR is crap.  The cars are far more antiquated than anything on the road (they just stopped using leaded gasoline a few years ago and they still use carburetors!) and all they do is drive in circles.  And to demonstrate how tough they are, they cancel a race any time a few drops of rain fall on the track.  Not even the perfumed princes of Formula 1 do that!

Anyway, racing is supposed to improve the breed.  That's its ultimate purpose; to develop technologies that are useful in production vehicles.  NASCAR can't do that because the rules keep the cars in the stone age.  Endurance racing, on the other hand, does.

Saturday, February 4, 2012

Audi R18 TDI Hybrid

Revisiting the post on fast hybrids, now Audi confirms that their R18 TDI endurance racer will feature a hybrid electric drive system for 2012.

The diesel era at Le Mans may not be over yet, but already we're seeing the emergence of a new propulsion trend: hybrids. Toyota recently announced the TS030 Hybrid LMP1, Peugeot was working on a hybrid version of its 908 prototype before it killed the race program, and now Audi has confirmed a hybrid version of the R18 TDI.

Few details were released, but what we can tell you is that Audi will field four cars at Le Mans this year: two with hybrid assist and two without. One will be headlined by Allan McNish, one by Oliver Jarvis, one by Timo Bernhard and one by André Lotterer, with supplemental drivers to be announced sometime before the 80th running of the 24 Hours of Le Mans kicks off in June.
I wonder why Audi went with two hybrids and two pure Diesels.  Maybe they're not convinced that hybrids are the way to go and want to test their viability against their well-tested, dominant counterparts.  I also wonder which drivers will be driving which cars.  After all, the skill and talent of the driver is still the most important variable in racing, and McNish is Audi's most experienced driver.  The car they give him to drive may indicate which they suspect is the best.

Here's Allan McNish explaining the 24 Hours of Le Mans in the coolest Audi commercial ever.
 

And here's the horrific crash that took him out of contention in 2011.

Friday, January 27, 2012

Fast Hybrids

These ain't no Prii, tree huggers!



Gotta love the Stig reference.  To be precise, they're not really testing which car is faster; meaning that they would test both cars for top speed.  They're actually testing which car is quicker.
According to the post-jump press release, the M35h is "faster" than the hybrid Panamera from 0-100 (11.54 seconds) and in the quarter mile (13.41 seconds).
On top of that, the EPA says the Infinity gets the better gas mileage of the two.
[T]he EPA estimates that the M35h will manage 27 miles per gallon in the city and 32 on the highway, for a combined rating of 29. The Porsche Panamera S Hybrid is rated at 22 city, 30 highway and 25 combined. 
Not that 32 mpg or 30 mpg on the highway are all that stellar.  But, I guess if you're rich and feel guilty about your sins against Gaia,  you can buy one of these to soothe your pseudo-Druid sensibilities while doing absolutely nothing to actually reduce your environmental impact.

Porsche GT3 R Hybrid
The article should've specified that the Infinity is the quickest production, street legal hybrid, because they're certainly slower than the Porsche GT3 R Hybrid.  The Wall Street Journal describes it this way:
What you have here is an experimental, 670-horsepower, all-wheel-drive, 2,860-pound gas-electric cyclone...
[U]nlike battery-equipped hybrids, the Porsche stores its amperage mechanically, spooling up a 31-pound flywheel operating in a vacuum chamber in (one hopes) a crash-proof box beside the driver. Under acceleration, the flywheel's enormous kinetic energy is converted back to electrons and returned to the front-wheel motors, helping the car go farther and faster. There is also the not-inconsiderable thrust provided by the 4.0-liter, 470-hp flat-six in the back, churning the rear wheels through a six-speed sequential gearbox. This car can accelerate and decelerate at about 1 g and corner at nearly 2 g, which is pretty physical, let me tell you. 
Audi's all-conquering R18 TDI; their third generation
Diesel (not hybrid) race car.
Most importantly, it's winning.  Why would a race car use a hybrid drive system designed to improve efficiency?  For the same reason Audi built a Diesel-powered race car - endurance racing.  When you race for many hours straight (the pinnacle of endurance racing, Le Mans, is a 24-hour race), making fewer pit stops can mean victory.
At the American Le Mans Series' six-hour endurance race at Mazda Raceway Laguna Seca in September, the GT3 R Hybrid walked away from the field, posting the fastest laps in the GT class and stopping only three times for fuel, compared with other competitors' five or more stops.
Check it out in action.



Not to be outdone, Toyota, the king of hybrids, will return to Le Mans this year with their own hybrid race car.



And now Audi may add a hybrid system to the R18 TDI.

Greenie weenies whine incessantly about racing.  It's wasteful and unnecessary, they say.  What they don't realize is that racing is like natural selection accelerated, thus the old saying; "racing improves the breed".  Nothing improves things more quickly or effectively than intense competition (keep that in mind, Socialists).  They also fail to realize that the same technologies that make a car faster - light weight materials, low-friction materials, direct injection, turbocharging - are easily modified to improve efficiency.

Face it, tree huggers; racing is the best thing to happen to hybrids.

Monday, December 19, 2011